Datum zveřejnění:

15.12.2017

DOI:  https://doi.org/10.21104/CL.2017.4.04

Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International. Český lid poskytuje otevřený přístup k veškerému svému obsahu v rámci licence
Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International.

Abstrakt:

Personal stories and testimonies of individual survivors are the main compounds of the common narrative of the European trauma of Nazi concentration camps. A variety of individual memories of a certain event contribute to the creation of its collective representation which is then accessible for a wider range of people. Memory is understood as socially determined. Thus the role of in-group relations is crucial for memory-construction, for it is only in social interactions that individuals become aware of memories and localize them. As Maurice Halbwachs argues, there are as many collective memories as there are groups and institutions in society. The relation between a collective memory and a group is reciprocal – both are constituting and constituted at the same time. Departing from the theories of memory and trauma as social constructs, this article examines the processes of remembering of the deportation to a concentration camp and structuring of collective memories.

Klíčová slova

collective memory, communicative memory, cultural memory, trauma, remembering

Text článku

Reference

Alexander, J. (2012). Trauma. A Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Assmann, A. (2013). Europe’s Divided Memory. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Assmann, A. (2012). Introduction to Cultural Studies. Topics, Concepts, Issues. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.
Assmann, A. (2011). Cultural Memory and Western Civilization. Functions, Media, Archives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Assmann, J., Czaplicka, J. (1995). Collective Memory and Cultural Identity. New German Critique, 65, pp. 125 – 133.
Berger, L., A. (1995). The Holocaust, Second-Generation Witness, and the Voluntary Convenant in American Judaism. Religion and American Culture: A Journal of Interpretation, 5(1), pp 23-47.
Blaive, M., Gerbel, Ch., Lindenberger, T. (2012). Clashes in European Memory. Innsbruck: Studien Verlag.
Campbell, S. (1997). Women, “False” Memory, and Personal Identity. Hypatia, 1(2), pp. 51 – 82.
Climo, J.-J. (1995). Prisoners of Silence: A Vicarious Holocaust Memory. In: M.-C. Teski, J.-J. Climo, eds. The Labyrinth of Memory. Ethnographic Journeys. Wesport: Bergin&Garvey, pp. 175 – 184.
Erll, A. (2005). Kollektives Gedächtnis und Erinnerungskulturen. Eine Einführung. Stuttgart: Verlag J. B. Metzler.
Eyerman, R. (2004). The Past in the Present. Culture and the Transmission of Memory. Acta Sociologica, 47(2), pp. 159 – 169.
Falzon, M-A. (2009). Multi-Sited Ethnography: Theory, Praxis and Locality in Contemporary Research. Oxford: Routlege.
Geertz, C. (1973). Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture. In:  The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books, pp. 3-30.
Halbwachs, M. (2009). Kolektivní paměť. Praha: Slon.
Helm, S. (2015). If This a Woman. London: Little Brown.
Jacobs, J. (2010). Memorializing the Holocaust. Gender, Genocide and Collective Memory. New York, NY: I. B. Tauris & Co.
Kidron, C. A. (2003). Surviving a Distant Past: A Case Study of the Cultural Construction of Trauma Descendant Identity. Ethos, 31(4), pp. 513-544.
Kidron, C. A. (2015). Survivor Family Memory Work at Sites of Holocaust Remembrance. History and Memory, 27(2), pp. 45-73.
Kidron, C. A. (2009). Toward an Ethnography of Silence. The Lived Presence of the Past in the Everyday Life of Holocaust Trauma Survivors and Their Descendants in Israel. Current Anthropology, 50(1), pp. 5 – 27.
Kuhn, A. (2002). Family Secrets. London: Verso.
LaCapra, D. (2001). Writing History. Writing Trauma. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Radstone, S. (2005). Reconcieving Binaries: The Limits of Memory. History Workshop Journal, 59(1), pp. 134 – 150.
Skleničková, J. (2016). Vzpomínky mě stále tíží. Lidice: Památník Lidice.
Sznaider, N. (2011). Suffering as a Universal Frame for Understanding Memory Politics. In: M. Blaive, C. Gerbel and T. Lindenberger, eds. Clashes in European Memory. The Case of Communist Repression and the Holocaust. Vienna: StudienVerlag, pp. 239-255.
Tarant, Z. (2013). Diaspora paměti. Plzeň: Západočeská univerzita v Plzni.