Datum zveřejnění:
25.3.2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21104/CL.2020.1.01
Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International.
Abstrakt:
Anthropological and legal literatures often claim that the anthropology of law is a boundary discipline between anthropology and law (or rather the legal sciences). From this point of view, the clear and unambiguous dividing line is a fundamental prerequisite for unproblematic interdisciplinary collaboration between social anthropologists and legal scholars and for the combination of ethnographic data with legal analysis. This article, on the other hand, recalls that in terms of the historical genesis of law-related disciplines, the relationship between the (social) anthropology and modern ontology of law embodied in the legal sciences, is entirely different. In particular, social sciences, and social anthropology in particular, have established themselves as reflexive empirical disciplines by continually transcending the spatial and temporal limits of modern legal ontology.
Klíčová slova
legal anthropology;law;anthropology;interdisciplinarity;historical school of law
Text článku
Reference
Abu-Lughod, Lila. 2008. Writing against Culture. In: Oaks, Timothy – Price, Patricia L.: The Cultural Geography Reader. Oxford: Routledge: 50–59.
Arendt, Hannah. 2006. What is Authority? In: Arendt, Hannah – Kohn, Jerome: Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought. New York: Penquin Books: 91–141.
Aureli, Filippo – De Waal, Franz. 2000. Natural Conflict Resolution.
Berkeley: University of California Press.
Beebee, Thomas Oliver. 2012. Citation and Precedent: Conjunctions
and Disjunctions of German Law and Literature. London: Continuum.
Bekoff, Marc – Pierce, Jessica. 2009. Wild Justice: The Moral Lives of
Animals. Chicago – London: The University of Chicago Press.
Benda-Beckmann, Franz von. 1989. Scapegoat and Magic Charm: Law in Development Theory and Practice. The Journal of Legal Pluralism
and Unofficial Law 21, 28: 129–148.
Benda-Beckmann, Franz von – Benda-Beckmann, Keebet von –
Griffiths, Anne. 2016. Mobile People, Mobile Law: Introduction. In: Benda-Beckmann, Franz von – Benda-Beckmann, Keebet von –
Griffiths, Anne: Mobile People, Mobile Law: Expanding Legal Relations
in a Contracting World. London: Routledge: 1–26.
Berman, Harold. 1983. Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bohannan, Paul. 1967. The Differing Realms of the Law. In: Bohannan, Paul: Law and Warfare: Studies in the Anthropology of Conflict. Austin: University of Texas Press: 43–50.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986a. Habitus, code et codification. Actes de la
recherche en sciences sociales 64 (De quel droit?): 40–44.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986b. La force du droit: Eléments pour une sociologie du champ juridique. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 64 (De quel droit?): 3–19.
Brightman, Robert. 1995. Forget Culture: Replacement, Transcendence, Relexification. Cultural Anthropology 10, 4: 509–546.
Cichá, Martina – Pospíšil, Leopold. 2014. Antropologie práva. In: Cichá, Martina: Integrální antropologie. Praha: Triton: 211–221.
Conley, John M. – O’Barr, William O. 1993. Legal Anthropology Comes Home: A Brief History of the Ethnographic Study of Law. The Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 27: 41–64.
Coombe, Rosemary. 2000. Contingent Articulations: A Critical Cultural Studies of Law. In: Sarat, Austin – Kearns, Thomas R.: Law in the Domains of Culture. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press: 21–64.
Darian-Smith, Eve. 2004. Ethnographies of Law. In: Sarat, Austin:
The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society. Cambridge: Blackwell: 545–568.
Donovan, James – Anderson, H. Edwin. 2003. Anthropology and Law. New York – Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Dreier, Ralf. 1976. Zur Problematik und Situation der Verfassungsinterpretation. In: Dreier, Ralf – Schwegmann, Friedrich: Probleme der Verfassungsinterpretation: Dokumentation einer Kontroverse. Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verlagsgesllschaft.
Dubovický, Ivan. 1997. Doslov. In: Pospíšil, Leopold: Etnologie práva: Teze ke studiu práva z mezikulturní perspektivy. Praha: Set out: 114–119.
Englund, Harri. 2015. Law, Law Everywhere. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 5, 3: 267–271.
Foblets, Marie-Claire. 2005. Mobility versus Law, Mobility in Law:
Judges in Europe Are Confronted with a Thorny Question ‘Which Law Applies to Litigants of Migrant Origin?’. In: Benda-Beckmann, Franz von – Benda-Beckman, Keebet von – Griffiths, Anne: Mobile People, Mobile Law. Expanding Legal Relations in a Contracting World. Aldershot: Ashgate: 297–315.
Foblets, Marie-Claire. 2017. Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology Report 2014–2016: Department ‘Law & Anthropology’. Halle/Saale:
Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology.
Furedi, Frank. 2013. Authority: A Sociological History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Geertz, Clifford. 2000. Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective. In: Geertz, Clifford: Local Knowledge: Further Essays
in Interpretive Anthropology. s.l.: Basic Books: 167–234.
Girard, René. 1965. Deceit, Desire, and the Novel: Self and Other in Literary Structure. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
Good, Anthony. 2007. Anthropology and Expertise in the Asylum Courts. Abingdon – New York: Routledge.
Goodale, Marc. 2017. Anthropology and Law: A Critical Introduction.
New York: New York University Press.
Grimm, Jacob. 1828. Deutsche Rechtsalterthümer. Leipzig: T. Weicher.
Hoebel, E. Adamson. 1954. The Law of Primitive Man: A Study in Comparative Legal Dynamics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hoebel, E. Adamson. 1963–1964. Karl Llewellyn: Anthropological
Jurisprude. Rutgers Law Review 18: 735–756.
Holländer, Pavel. 2009. Rudolf von Jhering – Osobnost, jež změnila
vnímání práva. In: Jhering, Rudolf von: Boj o právo: Právní věda
všedního dne. Plzeň: Vydavatelství a nakladatelství Aleš Čeněk: 3–8.
Holmes, Oliver Wendell. 1899. Law in Science and Science in Law. Harvard Law Review 12, 7: 443–463.
Holubová, Markéta. 2002. Obyčejové právo: Sborník příspěvků z konference karpatologické komise pro lidové obyčeje MKKK konané v Martině-Vrůtkách v roce 2001. Praha: Etnologický ústav Akademie věd České republiky.
Knapp, Viktor. 1995. Teorie práva. Praha: C. H. Beck.
Kuper, Adam. 1988. The Invention of Primitive Society: Transformations
of an Illusion. London: Routledge.
Latour, Bruno. 2010. The Making of Law: An Ethnography of the Conseil d’Etat. Cambridge: Cambridge Polity Press.
Leach, Edmund. 1959. Social Change and Primitive Law. American
Anthropologist 61: 1096–1097.
Ledvinka, Tomáš. 2014. Bruno Latour: The Making of Law. An Ethnography of the Conseil d’Etat. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 50, 6: 1008–1011.
Ledvinka, Tomáš. 2015. Antropologie práva. In: Schelle, Karel –
Tauchen, Jaromír: Encyklopedie českých právních dějin I. (svazek A–Č). Brno: Key Publisching: 267–271.
Ledvinka, Tomáš. 2016. Bronislaw Malinowski and the Anthropology of Law. In: Stępień, Mateusz: Bronislaw Malinowski’s Concept of Law. Cham: Springer International Publishing Switzerland: 55–81.
Ledvinka, Tomáš. 2017. Kaius Tuori, Lawyers and Savages: Ancient
History and Legal Realism in the Making of Legal Anthropology. Český lid 104: 391–392.
Llewellyn, Karl Nickerson. 1960. The Common Law Tradition: Deciding Appeals. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.
Llewellyn, Karl Nickerson – Hoebel, Adamson E. 1941. The Cheyenne Way: Conflict and Case Law in Primitive Jurisprudence. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Lydon, Ghislaine. 2009. On Trans-Saharan Trails: Islamic Law, Trade
Networks, and Cross-Cultural Exchange in Nineteenth-Century Western
Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Maine, Henry James Sumner. 1861. Ancient Law: Its Connection to the Early History of Society, and Its Relation to Modern Ideas. London: John Murray.
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1922. Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An Account of Native Enterprise and Adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Quinea. London: Routledge – Kegan Paul.
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1926. Crime and Custom in Savage Society.
London: Kegal Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.
Mauss, Marcel. 1966. The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. London: Cohen & West Ltd.
Mauss, Marcel. 1999. Esej o daru, podobě a důvodech směny v archaických společnostech. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství.
Mauss, Marcel. 2002. The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. London – New York: Routledge.
Mauss, Marcel. 2007. Manual of Ethnography. Oxford – New York:
Durkheim Press/Berghahn Books.
Mehrotra, Ajay K. 2001. Law and the ‘Other’: Karl N. Llewellyn,
Cultural Anthropology, and the Legacy of The Cheyenne Way.
Law & Social Inquiry 26: 741–775.
Merry, Sally Engle. 2003. Human Rights Law and the Demonization
of Culture. Political and Legal Anthropology Review 26, 1: 55–76.
Messick, Brinkley. 1993. The Calligraphic State: Textual Domination and History in a Muslim Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Mommsen, Theodor. 1888. Romisches Staatsrecht III. Leipzig: S. Herzel.
Nader, Laura. 1965. The Anthropological Study of Law. American
Anthropologist 67, 6 (Part 2: The Ethnography of Law): 3–32.
Nader, Laura. 2011. Ethnography as Theory. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 1, 1: 211–219.
Nafziger, James R. A. 2017. Introduction to Comparative Law and
Anthropology. In: Nafziger, James R. A.: Comparative Law and Anthropology. Cheltenham – Northhampton: Edgar Elgar Publishing: 1–13.
Nešpor, Zdeněk R. – Jakoubek, Marek. 2004. Co je a co není kulturní/sociální antropologie? Námět k diskusi. Český lid 91: 53–79.
Peters, Julie Stone. 2005. Law, Literature, and the Vanishing Real: On the Future of an Interdisciplinary Illusion. PMLA 120, 2: 442–453.
Pina-Cabral, João De. 2000. The Ethnographic Present Revisited. Social Anthropology 8, 3: 341–48.
Podgórecki, Adam. 1966. Sociologie práva. Praha: Svoboda.
Pospíšil, Leopold. 1958. Kapauku Papuans and Their Law. New Heaven: Yale University Publications in Anthropology.
Pospíšil, Leopold. 1971/1974. The Anthropology of Law: A Comparative
Theory. Ann Arbor: Harper and Row.
Pospíšil, Leopold. 1978. The Ethnology of Law. Menlo Park – Reading – London: Cummings Publishing Company.
Pospíšil, Leopold. 1997. Etnologie práva: Teze o studiu práva z mezikulturní perspektivy. Praha: Set out.
Pospíšil, Leopold. 2001. Corrections of a Reappraisal of Leopold
Pospisil. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 46: 115–120.
Post, Albert Hermann. 1891. Ethnological Jurisprudence. The Monist 2, 1: 31–40.
Renteln, Alison Dundes – Dundes, Alan. 1995. Folk Law: Essays in the Theory and Practice of Lex Non Scripta. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Soukup, Václav. 2004. Antropologie práva. In: Soukup, Václav: Dějiny antropologie. Praha: Karolinum: 580–582.
Soukup, Václav. 2017. Antropologie práva. In: Nešpor, Zdeněk R.: Sociologická encyklopedie. Praha: Sociologický ústav AV ČR, v. v. i. [on line] [2019-06-17] Dostupné z: encyklopedie.soc.cas.cz/w/Antropologie_pr%C3%A1va.
Strathern, Marilyn. 1987. An Awkward Relationship: The Case of Feminism and Anthropology. Signs 12: 276–292.
Throop, C. Jason. 2010. In the Midst of Action. In: Murphy, Keith M. – Throop, C. Jason: Toward an Anthropology of the Will. Stanford: Stanford University Press: 28–49.
Toews, John Edward. 2004. Law, Language, and History: Cultural Identity and the Self-constituting Subject in the Historical School. In: Toews, John Edward: Becoming Historical: Cultural Reformation and Public Memory in Early Nineteenth-Century Berlin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 281–418.
Tuori, Kaius. 2015. Lawyers and Savages: Ancient History and Legal Realism in the Making of Legal Anthropology. Oxon – New York: Routledge.
Tuori, Kaius. 2017. American Legal Realism and Anthropology. Law and Social Inquiry 42, 3: 804–829.
Vincent, Joan. 1990. Anthropology and Politics: Visions, Traditions, and Trends. Tuscon: University of Arizona Press.
Weber, Max. 2009. Metodologie, sociologie a politika. Praha:
OIKOYMENH.
Weisberg, Richard. 1974. Review of The Legal Imagination, by James
B. White. Columbia Law Review 74: 327–337.
Winter, Zikmund. 1892. Svědectví mrtvého. Český lid 1: 155–160.